11-2 |
|
S. K. SASTRY, Dept. of Food, Agricultural & Biological Engineering, Ohio State Univ., 590 Woody Hayes Dr., 206 Agricultural Engineering Bldg., Columbus, OH 43210-1058 Young faculty starting out in academia are required to develop a successful record in obtaining research grants. While some come in with some experience in this matter, most are not prepared for the slippery path ahead, and the learning curve may be steep. We will attempt to cover in some detail, the setting of research agendas, the selection of research area, some information on various funding entities, the development of a research proposal, and a discussion of the peer review process. Discussion on the setting of research agendas will deal with the importance of peer networking and active participation within one's professional society(ies). The selection of research area is a critical decision made early in a scientist's career, and adequate prior preparation is critical. The selection of funding agencies will typically follow, each with their own missions and priorities, and it is up to the scientist to keep abreast of the thinking in his or her field. The proposal preparation and critiquing process could make the difference between success and failure. Finally, an understanding of the peer review system is essential to maintaining success in grants over an extended period of time.
Session 11, Prismatic views of grantsmanship and federal funding opportunities
2005 IFT Annual Meeting, July 15-20 - New Orleans, Louisiana |